IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Sanjay Priya, J.
Ganesh Rai, S/o Sarakhi Rai and Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Devendra Kumar and ors. - Respondents
First Appeal No.97 of 1996
Decided On : 01-08-2019
Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1954 – Section 10 – Settlement of land by Bhoodan Yagna Committee – As per case of plaintiffs on the basis of Parwangi issued by Zamindar and filing of return by Zamindars in favour of plaintiffs after vesting of Zamindari, Jamabandi has already been created in their favour – State of Bihar has recognized them as tenant after vesting of Zamindari – Trial Court has rightly come to the finding on the basis of evidence both oral and documentary adduced on behalf of parties that ex-landlord has already settled suit land in favour of plaintiffs by Parwangi – Case of donation of land by heirs of ex-landlord in favour of Bhoodan Yagna Committee does not get substantiated – Land having been already settled by original Zamindar in 1939 itself in favour of plaintiffs heirs of Zamindars cannot have any right and title to donate land in 1953 to Bhoodan Yagna Committee – Impugned judgment and decree passed by Sub-Judge in Title Suit upheld – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 47, 49 to 52)
JUDGMENT :
This First Appeal has been filed by the Defendants-appellants against the judgment dated 02.08.1995 passed by Sub Judge II, Naugachia in Title Suit no. 19 of 1988, whereby the suit was decreed on contest against the defendants for the reliefs as sought declaring that the plaintiffs have right, title and interest in the suit land and that the lands were neither donated to the Bhoodan Yagna committee, nor the same was validly confirmed. It has further been declared that the Bhoodan yagna committee had no right to make any settlement of the suit land with the members of defendants 2nd party. The survey records of right prepared in their names with respect to the land of Schedule II is incorrect and without jurisdiction.
2. The plaintiff-respondent 1st set has filed the suit for declaration that Giribar Prasad Singh or his heirs had no right to donate the lands being 13 bighas, 13 katha, 11 dhurs and 10 dhurki of plot no. 3827 of Mouza-Pratap Nagar, as described in Schedule -I of the plaint, to the Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Committee. The plaintiffs sought further declaration that said committee never settled any land of Schedule-II which is part of Schedule-I land to defendant 2nd party nor did they acquire right, title and interest in the aforesaid land. The plaintiffs have prayed for decree of declaration of their title to the aforesaid land and for the declaration that survey record of right prepared in the name of defendants is incorrect.
3. The case of the plaintiffs’ as per plaint, in short, is that the land of CS khata no. 1596, was a Gair Majaruwa Malik land appertaining to Tauzi no. 4318. Babu Hanuman Prasad Singh and Babu Gajadhar Prasad Singh were two Zamindars of this Tauzi having equal shares. They were in possession of their share. They settled the land of Schedule-I with the plaintiffs in 1346 Fasli i.e. the year 1939 orally and put them in possession of the said land. The Zamindars also granted Parwangi in proof of the settlement and the plaintiffs remained and continued in possession of the same.
4. The further case of the plaintiffs is that after vesting of zamindari they submitted return of the said land in favour of plaintiffs. The State of Bihar has accepted the plaintiffs as Raiyat and opened Jamabandi in their name vide Jamabandi no. 90 in Register-II and granting rent receipts.
5. Further case of the plaintiffs is that the defendant 2nd party (appellants) are threatening them to dispossess from the aforesaid suit land. They are laying claim on the basis that heirs of the ex–landlord had donated the land to the Bhoodan Yagna Committee in 1956-57. The said committee had settled the land of Schedule-II to them separately.
6. The plaintiffs have further stated in the plaint that the ex-landlord had no right to make any donation to the Bhoodan Yagna Committee nor the Bhoodan Yagna Committee had right to settle the land to the defendants 2nd set. The defendants second set after bringing the Amlas of the survey in their collusion got prepared the record of right in their name which is incorrect and without jurisdiction.
7. The plaintiffs have also averred in the plaint that defendants 2nd set threatened on 21.04.1987 to interfere with the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs. They gave notice to them through their lawyer and thereafter filed the instant suit.
8. The defendant nos. 5, 12A, 12B have filed separate written statement and have admitted the case of the plaintiffs.
9. The common written statements have been filed by defendant nos. 3,7,8,9, 10 and 12. They have contested the claim of the plaintiffs, and stated that 50 bighas of land, appertaining to plot no. 3827 was donated to the Bhoodan Yagan Committee in the year 1953 by landlord Giribar Prasad Singh and seven others and Daan Patra was confirmed by the Revenue Authorities in the year 1957-58. The Bhoodan Yagan Committee distributed the land to these defendants as mentioned in detail in the written statement.
10. It is pertinent to mention here that after
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.