ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Century Businees Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Chief Electoral Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Raju Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Siddharth Prasad, learned counsel for the Chief Electoral Officer, Bihar (respondent no. 1)
2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to allow the petitioner, which is a private registered company, registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, to put up 950 hoarding at different sites in the State of Bihar including Unipoles, BQS and Wall Wraps etc., on private properties as part of election campaign.
3. The petitioner claims to have been engaged by a political party, namely, Bhartiya Janta Party for putting up such hoardings.
4. The necessity for filing this writ petition arose when the authorities concerned did not give any categorical reply to the representation/letter by the petitioner seeking approval from the Chief Electoral Officer, Bihar for putting up the hoardings with the permission of the owners of the properties as mandated under the Defacement of Property Act, 1987.
5. Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned senior counsel for the petitioner has also brought to the attention of this Court that the District Electoral Officer
Nelson Motis vs. Union of India and Another
Gurudevdatta Vksss Maryadit & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.