ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Espan Infrastructure (I) Limited Earlier known as Espan Infrastructure Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar Department of Road Construction, Visheshwaria Bhavan, Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the respondents
2. The petitioner company had bagged the contract for periodical repair work of NH -101 for the year 2016-17 at an estimated cost of Rs. 541.61 Lakhs against the Notice Inviting Tender(NIT) bearing No. 2/16-17 issued by the Executive Engineer, Chapra. The work had to be completed within five months. After the agreement was signed, the work started from 16.01.2017 and it was duly completed within the stipulated period of five months on 15.06.2017.
3. While executing the work under the agreement, the petitioner company had obtained Bitumen from Mathura Refinery of Indian Oil Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as “IOCL”) because of scarcity of Bitumen in Barauni Refinery and the aforesaid procurement was ratified by the respondents. Immediately after the completion of the project, the NH was sub-merged with flood water and some stretch of the roads repaired by the petitioner company got damaged. However, the necessary repairs were made and the Executive Engineer was informed about the same. The repair work was certified by the Assistant En
Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and Anr. (1975) 1 SCC 70
Patel Engineering Ltd. Vs. Union of India 2012 (11) SCC 257
Kulja Industries Ltd. Vs. Chief General Manager, Western Telecom Project
B.S.N. Joshi & Sons vs. Nair Cole Services Ltd. 2006 (11) SCC 548
Gorkha Securities Services vs. NCT of Delhi 2014 (9) SCC 105
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.