ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Jai Kishan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through its Senior Intelligence Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. Binod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Uma Shankar Verma, learned CGC for the Union of India through virtual Court proceedings.
2. In the present application preferred under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to set aside the order dated 01.11.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Khagaria in Special Case No. 18 of 2016, arising out of Khagaria P.S. Case No. 698/2016, whereby the petitioner's petition for release of his motorcycle bearing registration No. BR-34K-1834 seized in the aforesaid case, has been rejected saying that the final order is to be passed at the time of passing of judgment.
3. The aforesaid N.D.P.S. case was registered on the basis of self statement of the informant under Section 8/20(b) (ii) A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter in short referred to as the N.D.P.S. Act) stating therein that while he was on duty for maintaining law and order, on seeing the police one person tried to flee away by his motorcycle, on chase, he was stopped and on search 175 gms. Ganja was recovered from his possession.
4. Learne
General Insurance Council and Others vs. State of A.P. and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.