SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Pat) 942

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J.
Yugal Kishor Prasad – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Gaya and Others – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21826 of 2019
Decided On : 07-11-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agrawal, Ms. Aditi Hansaria, Ms. Deepika Sharma.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Mr. Akhilesh Kr. Sinha.

Headnote:

Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 – Section 6(2) – Direction to remove encroachment without passing any final order under Section 6(1) of Act, 1956 – Circle Officer has proceeded to issue impugned notice under Section 6(2) of Act, 1956 without passing any final order under Section 6(1) of Act, 1956 – Notice is illegal and de hors provisions contained in Act, 1956 and accordingly, quashed, with liberty to Circle Officer to pass final orders under Section 6(1) of Act, 1956 in connection with encroachment case, after considering objection already filed by petitioner – Till passing of final orders under Section 6(1) of Act, 1956, no coercive action shall be taken against petitioner. (Paras 3 and 4)

JUDGMENT :

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notice dated 21.10.2019, purportedly issued under Section 6(2) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act 1956”), whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been directed to remove the encroachment in question, without passing any final order under Section 6(1) of the Act, 1956.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no whisper about passing of the final order under Section 6(1) of the Act, 1956, in the impugned notice dated 21.10.2019, issued in Encroachment case no. 19 of 2019-20. It is further submitted that the Circle Officer, Nagar, Gaya was precluded from passing any punitive orders under Section 6(2) of the Act, 1956 without passing any final order under Section 6(1) of the Act, 1956.

3. This Court finds from the records of this case as also from the impugned notice dated 21.10.2019 that the Circle Officer, Nagar Gaya has proceeded to issue impugned notice dated 21.10.2019 under Section 6(2) of the Act, 1956 without passing any final order under Section 6(1) of the Act, 1956, hence the notice dated 21.10.2019 is illegal and de hors the provisions contained in the Act, 1956 and is accordingly, quashed, however with liberty to the Circle Officer, Nagar, Gaya to pass final orders under Section 6(1) of the Act, 1956 in connection with Encroachment case no. 19 of 2019-20, after considering the objection already filed by the petitioner herein as also after hearing the petitioner, for which this Court deems it fit and appropriate to fix the date and time of hearing as 20.11.2019 at 10.30 a.m.

4. It is needless to state that till the passing of the final orders under Section 6(1) of the Act, 1956, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top