MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Renu Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The instant case has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 21.03.2018 passed in Case No. 18214/2016 by the District Magistrate, Nawada, whereby and whereunder the appeal of the petitioner has been rejected. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the original order dated 05.08.2016 passed by the District Programme Officer, Social Welfare Department, Nawada in Case No. 48 (Miscellaneous) Kendra Sanchalan/2016, whereby and whereunder the selection of the petitioner on the post of Anganwari Sevika has been cancelled.
3. The brief facts of the case are that after being selected on the post of Anganwari Sevika at Centre No. 20, Chandinama East Kashichak, Nawada, the petitioner was working honestly and sincerely. The petitioner is stated to be suffering from kidney problem since 2004 and was/is undergoing treatment by the doctors at Patna. On 21.07.2016, since the petitioner was not feeling well, she had filed an application for grant of leave from 24.07.2016 to 31.07.2016.
Phul Kumari vs. The State of Bihar & others 2019(1) PLJR 1
Prabha Devi vs. The State of Bihar & Others 2018(3) PLJR 800
The engagement of Anganwari Sevika is not a post in the Government service and does not have protection under Article 311 of the Constitution. The requirement of principle of natural justice must be ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.