Anant Kumar Sharma vs State Of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Pat) 667

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Anant Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Lalit Kishore (AG), for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The instant case has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 24.10.2018 passed by the Commandant, BMP-15, Valmikinagar, Bagaha camp-BMP-6, Muzaffarpur, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been inflicted with the punishment of withholding of increment for six months. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing of the order dated 25.05.2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Military Police, Northern Zone, Muzaffarpur, whereby and whereunder the appeal of the petitioner has been rejected.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had taken leave of nine days from 11.06.2018, for taking his daughter to Delhi to get her admitted in a coaching institute and he was supposed to join duty on 21.06.2018 but on account of certain unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner found that he would not be able to join his duty on 21.06.2018, hence he submitted a representation before the Commandant, BMP-15, Valmikinagar on 19.06.2018 by E-mail and requested h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document