MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Swastik Associate – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The instant case has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Shri Gautam Kumar Kejriwal and the learned counsel for the Respondent- Railways, Shri Kumar Priya Ranjan, Advocate.
3. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the demurrage penalty imposed upon the petitioner to the tune of Rs. 5,60,700/-, by the respondent Goods Superintendent, Dauram Madhepura, East Central Railway, as also for quashing the letter dated 21.01.2020, issued by the respondent Divisional Railway Manager [Commercial] East Central Railway, Samastipur, whereby and whereunder the application of the petitioner for waiver of demurrage charges been rejected.
4. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had booked consignment of cement bags with the railways, to be transported by Railway Wagons. The rake of 42 wagons, containing the cement consignment of the petitioner had arrived at the Dauram siding on 27.09.2019, however, the petitioner could not unload the cement bags from the wagons within the stipulated
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India [(1969) 2 SCC 262 : AIR 1970 SC 150]
Keshav Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union of India [(1973) 1 SCC 380 : AIR 1973 SC 389]
R. v. Gaming Board for Great Britain
S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India
State of Orissa vs. Dhaniram Luhar
Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.