SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 510

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anshu Dhar Sharma, Advocate, Brajendra Nath Pandey, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. The case has been taken up out of turn on the basis of motion slip filed by learned counsel for the petitioner on 29.07.2021, which was allowed.

3. Heard Mr. Anshu Dhar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

4. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sakra PS Case No. 488 of 2020 dated 26.09.2020, instituted under Sections 30(a)/38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

5. The allegation against the petitioner is that when the police, on prior information that he had stored liquor at his house, went there, on seeing the raiding party, one person fled away, who was identified by the locals to be the petitioner and near the door of his house of brick and asbestos, 45 litres of branded whisky was recovered.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that from the FIR itself it is clear that the recovery is from outside the house of the petitioner and that he has no connection with such recovery. It was further submit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top