AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video conferencing.
2. The case has been taken up out of turn on the basis of motion slip filed by learned counsel for the petitioner on 29.07.2021, which was allowed.
3. Heard Mr. Anshu Dhar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.
4. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sakra PS Case No. 488 of 2020 dated 26.09.2020, instituted under Sections 30(a)/38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').
5. The allegation against the petitioner is that when the police, on prior information that he had stored liquor at his house, went there, on seeing the raiding party, one person fled away, who was identified by the locals to be the petitioner and near the door of his house of brick and asbestos, 45 litres of branded whisky was recovered.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that from the FIR itself it is clear that the recovery is from outside the house of the petitioner and that he has no connection with such recovery. It was further submit
Recovery near the petitioner's house constituted an offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, leading to the dismissal of the petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1....
Alleged recovery of liquor from the petitioner's house constituted an offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, and the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act was found to be applicable, lea....
The application for anticipatory bail may not be maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, if an offence is prima facie made out due to recovery from the petitio....
Recovery of a large amount of liquor from the petitioner's field constituted an offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, leading to the dismissal of the petitioner's petition under S....
The lack of recovery of liquor from the petitioner's house and the different brand of liquor recovered from the motorcycle influenced the court's decision in granting bail to the petitioner.
The recovery of contraband from a premises belonging to the accused can constitute a prima facie offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, leading to the dismissal of a petition under Secti....
Point of law: Rejection of pre-arrest bail - Search and seizer of liquor - Petitioners live in a joint house and from the place from which recovery has been made is under their control and possession....
The specific mention of recovery of evidence from the accused's premises in the FIR and seizure list can influence the maintainability of a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedur....
The recovery of a huge quantity of liquor from a vehicle owned by the petitioner constitutes an offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, and triggers the application of Section 76(2)....
Prima facie evidence of an offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 leads to the dismissal of a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.