SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 496

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Chandeshwar Rajak – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, for the Appellant; Mr. S.D. Yadav (AAG 9), for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

2. There appears to be a typographical mistake in describing the petitioner's name in the writ petition. Apparently, out of inadvertence, the petitioner's name has been typed as Dr. Chandeshwar Rajak in place of Dr. Chandeshwari Rajak.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be permitted to correct the petitioner's name.

4. Let the petitioner's name be treated to be Dr. Chandeshwari Rajak for all purposes of the present writ application, as I am satisfied with the bonafide of the mistake on perusal of the documents on record.

5. Let necessary corrections be made in the cause title of the writ petition.

6. The petitioner is a member of Bihar Health Service. Briefly narrated the case of the petitioner is that while posted as Deputy Superintendent-cum-Drawing Disbursing Officer, Sub-Divisional Hospital, Mohania, under telephonic instruction of the Health Minister, Government of Bihar, he has been made to work as Medical Officer in the said hospital under an order dated 01.09.2020 issued by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Kaimur. By the said order he ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top