SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1094

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Purnendu Singh, J.
Dr. Raman Kumar Singh @ Raman Kumar Singh Son of Shivendra Prasad Singh - Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Bihar - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17019 of 2024
Decided On : 19-12-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr.Madhumay Madhup, Advocate Mr. Anand Kumar Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Nishikant, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr.Standing Counsel 21

Disciplinary actions must adhere to procedural rules and principles of natural justice; failure to do so renders the action invalid.

Headnote:(A) Bihar CCA Rules, 2005 - Rule 14, Rule 19 - Writ petition for reinstatement - Petitioner removed from post without due process, violating principles of natural justice and departmental rules - Court emphasized adherence to procedural requirements in disciplinary actions. (Paras 7, 10)

(B) Judicial Review - Scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters is limited to ensuring compliance with natural justice, evidence-based findings, and adherence to statutory rules. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, after 15 years of service, was removed from the post of In-Charge Medical Officer due to complaints of misconduct and absence from duty. The removal was challenged on grounds of lack of due process and adherence to departmental rules.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the removal order was issued without following the mandatory procedures outlined in the Bihar CCA Rules, 2005, and emphasized the need for adherence to natural justice.

Issues: The main issues were whether the removal was justified and whether due process was followed in the disciplinary action against the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the removal was invalid due to the failure to follow the required procedures and principles of natural justice, emphasizing that administrative decisions must adhere to statutory rules.

Result: Writ petition allowed; petitioner reinstated.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr.Madhumay Madhup along with Mr. Anand Kumar Tiwari and Mr. Nishikant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned SC 21 for the State.

2. Petitioner has inter alia prayed for following reliefs in the paragraphs No.1 of the writ petition:-

    “(I) To issue an appropriate writ in nature of certiorari for setting aside the order dated. 24/08/2024 of the Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer, District-Sheohar (Respondent No. 1) contained in Annexure P/24, whereby and whereunder the Respondent No. 3 has removed the petitioner from the post of In-Charge Medical-Cum-Withdrawal and Disbursement Officer at Primary Health Centre, Traiyani.

    (ii) To issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the concerned respondents to reinstate the petitioner on the post of In-Charge Medical Officer- Cum -Withdrawal and Disbursement Officer at Primary Health Centre, Taryani along with consequential benefits.

    (iii) To grant any other relief, which Your Lordship may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience.”

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner straight away refers to communication contained in Memo No.411(3) dated 20.06.2023, by which the Deputy Secretary, Health Department has directed the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Sheohar to consider the case of Dr. Kamlesh Kumar Kamal, who was posted as Medical Officer, Additional Primary Health Centre, Shalimpur and upon his complaint (Complaint No.8260120032308367), on 09.06.2023 and 21.04.2023 orders have been passed that the petitioner is senior to Dr. Kamlesh Kumar Kamal and action is required to be taken in accordance with departmental order No.1091(3) dated 21.12.2021 and letter No.96(3) dated 09.03.2022. At the same time, petitioner has drawn attention of this Court towards letter in letter no.52 dated 22.08.2024, by which Member of Parliament has requested the Civil Surgeon, Sheohar to take appropriate action against the petitioner, who was posted for last 15 years at the same Primary Health Centre. In compliance of the complaint made by the Member of Parliament, learned counsel submitted that without following the due process of law, the petitioner has been demoted and has been posted in the same Primary Health Centre as Medical Officer vide Memo No.- 532 dated 24.08.2024 and Dr. Kamlesh Kumar Kamal, who is Junior to the petitioner has been posted as In-charge Medical Officer-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer. Learned counsel further submitted that the order is not only derogatory and demoralizing to the petitioner but at the same time, it is against the service condition rules, as well as, it is punitive in nature as without following the due process of law, the petitioner has been penalized to work under his junior.

4. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3, who are the Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department and Director Health Services, Bihar, Patna. Referring to several paragraphs, he submitted that from the very inception, the petitioner as a matter of right cannot claim to continue to hold the charge of post of In-charge, Medical Officer-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Primary Health Centre, Tariyani and considering the administrative exigency, he was relieved of the charge in public interest. In paragraph 10, summary of the background facts as made available by the Civil Surgeon has been reiterated and the same is reproduced hereinafter:

    “That the brief summary of the background facts as made available by the Civil Surgeon, Sheohar are being stated as hereunder:-

    (i) Petitioner has remained posted as Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Tariyani for about 15 years and in the capacity of being Incharge Medical Officer of the Primary Health Centre in question, he has continuously misbehaved with senior/junior officers and female/male employees of the Primar

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top