MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Vimal Yadav @ Vimal Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The instant case has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.
2. The present petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 17.09.2011 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Saharsa, whereby and whereunder the license of the public distribution system shop of the petitioner bearing License No. 17/2018 has been cancelled as also the appellate order dated 30.08.2017 passed by the learned Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Saharsa and the order passed by the learned Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa, whereby and whereunder the Supply Revision Case No. 58 of 2017, has been dismissed by an order dated 04.12.2019.
3. The brief facts of the case are that on 05.05.2011, the Commissioner, Koshi Division had constituted a team for inspection of the PDS shop of the petitioner and upon inspection certain irregularities were found, whereafter an inspection report was submitted to the licensing authority. A show cause was then issued to the petitioner on 25.08.2011 inter alia mentioning therein the various irregularities having
Mahabir Prasad Santosh Kumar vs. The State of UP & Ors.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [(1978) 1 SCC 248 : AIR 1978 SC 597]
Siemens Engg. and Mfg. Co. of India Ltd. v. Union of India [(1976) 2 SCC 981 : AIR 1976 SC 1785]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.