AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Mina Devi (female) – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video conferencing.
2. Heard Mr. Mirityunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.
3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Vibhutipur PS Case No. 245 of 2020 dated 22.08.2020, instituted under Sections 272/2734 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').
4. The allegation against the petitioner is that with regard to recovery made by the police of 5507.640 litres of foreign liquor from one Truck, one Bolero pick-up, one Mahindra Scorpio and two motorcycles; one motorcycle was registered in the name of the petitioner, from which 17.280 litres of foreign liquor was recovered.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she is a lady aged 45 years and has absolutely no connection with such seizure as it cannot be expected and believed that she would be driving the motorcycle. It was submitted that because her husband lives outside, as the motorcycle was lying, she had given it to her neighbour, who had
The recovery of incriminating evidence from the petitioner's possession can render a pre-arrest bail petition not maintainable under the relevant provisions of the law.
Prima facie establishment of an offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act based on the ownership of the motorcycle and its connection to the recovery of illegal substances.
Bail was granted due to lack of incriminating evidence and long custody period.
The decision emphasizes the importance of evidence and antecedents in granting pre-arrest bail under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
The recovery of a huge quantity of liquor from a vehicle owned by the petitioner constitutes an offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, and triggers the application of Section 76(2)....
The specific mention of recovery of evidence from the accused's premises in the FIR and seizure list can influence the maintainability of a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedur....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.