SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 771

ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Birendra Narayan Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Mr.Akash Raj, for the Appellant; Mr. Ajit Kumar, Mr. Binoda Nand Mishra, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Binoda Nand Mishra, the learned Advocate for the respondent / University and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned Advocate for the State.

2. This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities for making payment of dues of salary of the petitioner from April 2003 to February 2013 and 50% of salary from March 2013 to September 2015 on which date, he superannuated from service and other benefits which have been listed in paragraph -1 of the writ petition.

3. Some confusion appears to have been created in the concerned college which is an affiliated college of the respondent / University.

4. The petitioner was appointed as a lecturer in Economics in the year 1978 after observing the due procedure for appointment of lecturers in a private affiliated college. There was an another advertisement in the year 1981 for appointment of lecturer in Economics subject in the college and the petitioner was again appointed against such advertisement. His appointment was confirmed by the syndicate of the University and later was approved by the College Service Commission.

5. In the college, there are only

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top