SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 743

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Bala Kant Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ram Sumiran Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioners in both the cases were employees of Patna Regional Development Authority (for short PRDA) which admittedly stood dissolved and merged with the Patna Municipal Corporation (for short the Corporation) with effect from 02.02.2007. This is also not in dispute that consequent upon merger with the Corporation all employees of PRDA became the employees of the Corporation. The employees of the Corporation are entitled to pensionary benefits under statutory Patna Municipal Corporation Officers and Servants Pension Rules, 1986 (for short the PMC Pension Rules), published in Bihar Gazettee on 20.03.1987. The PMC Pension Rules came into force with effect from 01.01.1986. The sole question, which these two writ applications involve is, as to whether the employees of erstwhile PRDA, who became the employees of the Corporation in the aforesaid manner, are entitled to benefits under the PMC Pension Rules for grant of monthly pension and family pension. As the issue involved in both the cases is common, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by the present common judgment and order.

2. It is noted at the outset that this question had earlier arisen before

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top