IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.
Prof. (Dr.) Shlok Kumar Chakravarti S/o Late Mauzi Singh - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7739 of 2020
Decided On : 02-02-2022
All India Council for Technical Education Regulations on Pay Scales, Service Conditions and Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff such as Library and Physical Education Personnel in Technical Institutions and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Technical Education - (Diploma) Regulations, 2019 – Regulations 2.26(3) and 4.7 read with Regulations 3.4(ii) and 5.2(f) of AICTE (Degree) Regulation, 2019 – Appointment on post of Principal/Director of a Technical Institute – A person can be eligible to be appointed as Principal of a Technical Institution within meaning of Section 2(h) of AICTE Act only if he is from a programme being run in the technical institution, by virtue of provision under Regulation 2.26(3) of AICTE (Diploma) Regulation, 2019, and Regulation 3.4(ii) of AICTE (Degree) Regulation, 2019 – No material has been placed before Court that subject Physics is run as a programme of education, research and training in Government Polytechnics/Government Engineering Colleges in question for which advertisements have been issued – Petitioner holds a qualification in Physics, a science subject, but does not qualify in terms of advertisement, according to which, qualification in Engineering/Technology is must to be eligible to be considered for the post – Eligibility condition that an aspirant must possess a qualification in engineering/technology cannot be said to be contrary to statutory provisions, rather they are in tune with statutory requirements – Writ Application dismissed. (Paras 5, 27, 31, 33 to 35)
JUDGMENT :
Whether a Faculty from Humanities and Sciences can be considered eligible for the post of Principal/Director of a Technical Institute governed by All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987 and the Regulations framed thereunder is the core issue for determination in the present writ application.
2. The petitioner is a Lecturer in the subject of Physics at Government Polytechnic, Bhojpur. He holds M.Sc. Degree in Physics and PhD in the said subject. The Bihar Public Service Commission has issued Advertisement No. 13 of 2020 and 15 of 2020 for filling up posts of Principles in Government Polytechnics and Government Engineering Colleges, under the Department of Science and Technology, Government of Bihar.
3. The advertisement for the post of Principal for Polytechnic College (Advertisement No. 13 of 2020) lays down the following eligibility condition in terms of educational qualification: -
4. The advertisement for the post of Principal in Government Engineering College (Advertisement No. 15 of 2020), on the other hand, lays down the following minimum educational qualification: -
5. As has been noted above, the petitioner holds a qualification in Physics, a science subject, but does not qualify in terms of the advertisement, according to which, the qualification in Engineering/Technology is must to be eligible to be considered for the said post.
6. The petitioner has challenged the aforesaid two advertisements to the extent they lay down minimum educational qualification of Engineering and Technology related branch only. It is the petitioner’s case that the said prescription in the advertisements is contrary to the provisions under All India Council for Technical Education Regulations on Pay Scales, Service Conditions and Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff such as Library and Physical Education Personnel in Technical Institutions and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Technical Education – (Diploma) Regulations, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AICTE (Diploma) Regulation, 2019’) and the All India Council for Technical Education Regulations on Pay Scales, Service Conditions and Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff such as Library and Physical Education and Training & Placement Personnel in Technical Institutions and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Technical Education – (Diploma) Regulations, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AICTE (Degree) Regulation, 2019’).
7. Regulation 4.7 of the AICTE (Diploma) Regulation, 2019, lays down the educational qualification for Principal through direct recruitment as under: -
PhD and First Class at either Bachelor's or Master's level in the relevant discipline with a minimum of 16 years of experience in Teaching/Research/Industry, out of which at least 3 years shall be post-PhD experience and 5 years of experience not below the level of HoD.
Or
First Class at Bachelor's or Master's level in the relevant discipline with a minimum of 20 years of experience in Teaching/Research/Industry, out of which 5 years of experience not below the level of HoD."
8. Regulation 5.2(f) of AICTE (Degree) Regulation, 2019 prescribes qualification for direct recruitment of Principal/Director of a technical institution governed by the said regulation as under: -
a. PhD degree and First Class or equivalent at either Bachelor's or Master's level in the relevant branch.
b. At least two successful Ph. D. guided as Supervisor/Co-Supervisor and minimum 8 research publications in SCI journals/UGC/AICTE approved list of journals.
c. Minimum 15 years of experie
Dr Chaman Lal Bansal and Another vs. University of Delhi and Others
while two posts are to be equated, the equivalence of salary of the two posts is one of the factors to be considered while equivalence has to be granted.
The court established that the eligibility criteria for the post of Junior Engineer allowed for candidates with high technical qualifications regardless of the educational channel, and that the princ....
R & P Rules for post clearly provide for recognition of qualification and not higher qualification.
Appointment on Post of Junior Engineer (Electrical) – Minimum qualification for the post cannot be deemed to be only matriculation but rather that only such of those matriculates, or 10+2 pass studen....
The court established that qualifications for teaching positions must strictly conform to specified educational requirements and cannot include degrees deemed non-equivalent.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the conflict between the Special Rules and Section 25(b) of the Act, and the court's finding that the fiction under Section 2....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.