SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 311

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ.
Shri Govind Sakli Epili, S/o. Sakli Dahanu Epili – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.801 OF 2017 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.18752 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.1766 OF 2017 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.18756 OF 2021, WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.1769 OF 2017 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.18759 OF 2021
Decided on : 05-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vishal P. Shirke
For the Respondent: Mr. Advait Shethna with Ms. Neeta Masurkar, Mr. Ashok Varma and Poushali Roychoudhary, Adv.

Headnote:

Recruitment Rules - Educational Qualification - 3 years Diploma or equivalent in Engineering/Technology/Draftsmanship - Indian Ordnance Factories Group-C Supervisory and Non-Gazetted Cadre (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1989, Amendment Rules, 2003 - The court discussed the requirement of educational qualification for the post of Chargeman (Technical) as per the Recruitment Rules, the amendments made to the rules, and the interpretation of the rules in relation to the qualifications possessed by the petitioners. The court emphasized the statutory force of the Recruitment Rules and the binding nature of the rules on all concerned, ultimately dismissing the writ petitions.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged their reversion from the post of Chargeman (Technical) after it was discovered that their Diploma qualifications were not approved by the AICTE, as required by the Recruitment Rules.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners did not fulfill the requisite educational qualification of having a Diploma approved by AICTE as per the Recruitment Rules. The court emphasized the statutory force of the Recruitment Rules and dismissed the writ petitions.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners fulfilled the educational qualification requirement for the post of Chargeman (Technical) as per the Recruitment Rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners did not fulfill the requisite educational qualification as prescribed in the Recruitment Rules, and emphasized the binding nature of the rules on all concerned.

Final Decision: The writ petitions were dismissed, and the court directed that no recovery of salary difference shall be made from the petitioners. The petitioners were also directed to be considered for promotion to the post of Chargeman (Technical) within the 50% quota for promotees, in accordance with the rules and their eligibility.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Vishal P. Shirke, learned counsel representing the Petitioners and Mr. Advait Sethna, learned Counsel representing the Respondents – Union of India and perused the records available before us on these petitions.

2. Since all the three petitions raise common question of facts and law, the same are being decided by the common judgment which follows :

CHALLENGE :

3. By instituting these petitions, the Petitioners assail the judgment and order dated 2nd January 2017 passed by the Mumbai Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the “Tribunal”) whereby the Original Applications filed by the Petitioners challenging their reversion from the post of Chargeman (Technical) have been dismissed.

FACTS IN BRIEF :

4. Since the facts as narrated and culled out from the pleadings available on record are similar in these petitions, Writ Petition No.801 of 2017 shall be treated to be the leading Writ Petition and facts of the said case shall be narrated for convenience.

5. All the Petitioners are working in different Ordnance Factories under the Ministry of Defence, Government of India. Recruitment Rules of Group-C Supervisory and Non-Gazetted Cadre in the Ordnance Factories are governed by the Recruitment Rules framed by the Government of India in exercise of powers conferred upon it under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India known as the “Indian Ordnance Factories Group-C Supervisory and Non-Gazetted Cadre (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1989” (hereinafter referred to as the “Recruitment Rules, 1989”). Rule 4 of the Recruitment Rules, 1989 provides for method of appointment, age limit, qualification etc. It also provides that other matters connected therewith shall be as specified in columns 5 to 14 of the Schedule appended to the Rules. According to the Schedule, as it existed prior to its amendment, educational and other qualification required for direct recruitment to the post of Chargeman (Technical) was, recognized 3 years Diploma or equivalent in Engineering/Technology/Draftsmanship with 5 years’ experience in relevant technical field or B.Sc. with Physics Chemistry and Maths with 5 years’ experience where diploma for any category cannot be identified by Ordnance Factory Board (OFB).

6. The said Recruitment Rules, 1989 were amended on 28th November 1994, whereby it was provided that 25% posts shall be filled-in by direct recruitment, 25% by Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (hereinafter referred to as the “LDCE”) from amongst the incumbents working as skilled workers with 2 years’ experience in the grade and 50% posts are to be filled-in by way of promotion.

7. The amendment in the Recruitment Rules notified on 28th November 1994 further provides that for LDCE, educational qualification prescribed for direct recruitment shall also be one of the requisites. The Recruitment Rules were again amended by promulgating Indian Ordnance Factories Group-C Supervisory and Non-Gazetted Cadre (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Amendment Rules, 2003 which were notified by the Ministry of Defence on 27th May 2003. By this 2003 Amendment, the Schedule was amended and for the post of Chargeman (Technical) the educational qualification prescribed for direct recruitment was altered and thus the candidate for being recruited to the post of Chargeman (Technical) was required to possess 3 years’ Diploma or equivalent qualification certificate in the respective field duly affiliated by the All India Council for Technical Education (hereinafter referred to as the “AICTE”). Though by amending the Recruitment Rules in the year 2003 the qualification for diploma duly affiliated by AICTE was prescribed for direct recruitment, however, the said qualification is applicable for recruitment through LDCE as well by virtue of the amendment introduced in the Recruitment Rules vide

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top