SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Pat) 573

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mohit Kumar Shah, J.
M/s Gangotri Iron And Steel Co. Ltd. - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Bihar And Others - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2726 of 2015
Decided On : 13-08-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Sr. Advocate Mr. Mohit Agarwal, Advocate Mrs. Priya Gupta, Advocate Mr. Alok Kumar Agrawal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sriram Krishna, Advocate Mr. Kumar Saurav

Headnote:

Industrial Incentive Policy, 2006 – Clause 2 (vi) read with Annexure-III – Petition for directing State Government to take decision with regard to grant of reimbursement equal to amount of taxes deposited by petitioner by way of subsidy in terms of Industrial Incentive Policy, 2006 – Clause-2(vi) provides for availing 80% reimbursement by new units, against admitted VAT amount deposited in account of Government, for a period of ten years and clarification thereof admittedly postulates that incentive would not be payable on amount imposed as penalty and difference of amount between tax assessed and accepted under Central Sales Tax/Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and Bihar Entry Tax Act, meaning thereby that incentive would be payable on rest of amount under the three types of taxes i.e. Central Sales Tax, Bihar Value Added Tax and Bihar Entry Tax – Subsidy/ incentive would not only be available on VAT but also on Entry Tax – Subsidy/incentive under Clause 2(vi) of Industrial Incentive Policy, 2006 shall also cover subsidy/incentive on Entry Tax – There is no provision in entire Industrial Incentive Policy, 2006 which postulates exclusion of amount of Entry Tax from the term "admitted VAT" – State Government has envisaged to give subsidy/incentive, under Industrial Incentive Policy, 2006, qua amount of admitted VAT, which apparently also includes Bihar Entry Tax – Subsidy/incentive is to be granted on payment made towards admitted Tax on account of Bihar VAT Act, Bihar Entry Tax Act as well as Central Sales tax Act – Once State Government has made a clear and unequivocal promise regarding grant of subsidy/incentive, knowing and intending that it would be acted upon by promisee and promisee, acting in reliance on it, alters his position, Government would be held bound by promise and promise would be enforceable against Government at instance of promise – Writ petition allowed with direction to respondents to grant subsidy / reimbursement to petitioner under Industrial Incentive Policy, 2006, qua payments made by it towards admitted Tax under Bihar VAT Act, Bihar Entry Tax Act and Central Sales tax Act, for relevant period for which petitioner is entitled to, within a period of three months. (Paras 14 to 17)

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 115 – Doctrine of promissory estoppel is applicable against government in exercise of its governmental, public or executive functions and doctrine of executive necessity on freedom of future executive action cannot be invoked to defeat applicability of doctrine of promissory estoppel. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT :

1. The present writ petition has been filed for directing the State Government to take a decision with regard to grant of reimbursement equal to the amount of taxes deposited by the petitioner by way of subsidy in terms of the Industrial Incentive Policy, 2006 and immediately transfer the funds on the head of subsidy towards admitted tax paid on account of Bihar VAT Act, Bihar Entry Tax Act as also the Central Sales Tax Act to the Sales Tax Department, in order to enable it to disburse the amount of such subsidy to the petitioner herein.

2. The brief facts of the case according to the petitioner is that it is engaged in the business of manufacturing M.S. Billets TMT Steel Bars & Industrial Oxygen Gas. The petitioner is stated to have commenced commercial production at Bihta Unit with effect from 11.01.2009, as per the certificate issued by the Director, Technical Department, Bihar, Patna vide letter dated 22.10.2009. It is the further case of the petitioner that the respondent State of Bihar had announced Industrial Policy, 2006 wherein various incentives were promised for the purposes of attracting investment in the State of Bihar. The said Industrial Incentive Policy, 2006 was published in the official gazette of the State Government on 25.07.2006.

3. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the relevant clauses of the Industrial Incentive Policy, 2006, which are reproduced herein below:-

    2. POST-PRODUCTION INCENTIVES

"(vi) subsidy/Incentive on VAT:

This facility will be available to small / large / medium industries. The industrial unit will get a passbook from the State Government in which the details of the tax paid under Bihar VAT would be entered and verified by the commercial Taxes Department in the form prescribed in Appendix-III.

The Director, Industries will be authorised to pay the incentive amount on the basis of the verification.

The new Units will avail 80% reimbursement against the admitted VAT amount deposited in the account of the Government, for a period of ten years. The maximum subsidy amount is payable 300% of the capital invested.

Clarification: The incentive would not be payable on the amounts imposed as penalty and the difference of amount between tax assessed and accepted under the Central Sales Tax/Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and Bihar Entry Tax Act. "

Annexure-I:- Relevant clauses thereof are reproduced herein below:-

"1. Effective date: "Effective date" means the date on which the provisions of this Policy come into force i.e. 01.04.2006. This Policy will remain in force for 5 years from the date of issue of orders.

4. New Industrial Unit: "New Industrial Unit" means an industrial unit in which commercial production has commenced within five years from 01.04.2006.

    8. Expansion/Modernisation/Diversification:

"Expansion/Modernisation/Diversification of an existing unit" would mean additional fixed capital investment in plant and machinery to the extent of 50% or more of the undepreciated value of fixed capital investment in the existing unit leading to incremental production capacity which would not be less than 50% of the initial installed capacity. In order to qualify a unit undertaking expansion/ modernisation/diversification should send prior intimation to the General Manager, District Industries Centres or the Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authorities & Deputy Commissioner Commercial Taxes, as the case may be in respect of Small Scale Industry or the Director of Industries/director, Technical Development and Commissioner, Commercial Taxes in case of medium and large industries before undertaking such expansion/ modernisation/ diversification Programme. Such intimation should be accompanied by detailed expansion/modernisation/diversification proposal giving the specific period of proposed additional investment. "

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top