IN THE HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.
Nityanand Sharma And Others - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Bihar And Others - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16074 of 2019
Decided On : 29-01-2020
Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011 – Section 9 (1) – Bihar Land Mutation Rules, 2012 – Rule 13(3) – Cancellation of Jamabandi – Additional Collector either suo motu or on an application in this behalf filed by any person is required to record his own satisfaction with regard to creation of Jamabandi in violation of any law or in contravention of any executive instruction and only thereafter shall initiate proceeding and issue notice to person in whose name Jamabandi is standing – Additional Collector appears to have acted perfunctorily and initiated proceeding for cancellation of Jamabandi without recording his own satisfaction merely on receipt of petition of respondent – Order and notice issued thereupon are illegal and fit to be set aside – Matter remitted to Additional Collector to pass order afresh in accordance with law. (Para 8)
ORDER :
1. Heard both sides.
2. Petitioner filed this writ petition for quashing order dated 08.07.2019 (Annexure 2) passed by the Additional Collector, Kishanganj initiating a proceeding for cancellation of jamabandi standing in the name of the petitioner and for quashing the notice (Annexure 3) issued pursuant to the order dated 08.07.2019.
3. The petitioner assailed the order on the ground that the Additional Collector has not recorded his satisfaction for holding an enquiry that the jamabandi standing in the name of the petitioner is created in violation of any law or the circular issued thereupon. For initiation of enquiry, the satisfaction of the Additional Collector is a sine-qua-non and unless the Additional Collector recorded his satisfaction, the order initiating a proceeding for cancellation of jamabandi and notice issued thereupon are illegal, fake and fit to be set aside.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent State contended that simple notice was issued and the writ petition is premature.
5. The only question arises for consideration whether the Additional Collector is vested with power to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of jamabandi without recording his satisfaction that jamabandi was created in violation of any law for the time being in force or in contravention of any executive instruction?
6. Section 9 (1) of the Bihar Land Mutation Act provides as follows:-
7. Rule 13 (3) of the Bihar Land Mutation Rules also stipulates that the Additional Collector before initiation of proceeding for cancellation of jamabandi must record his satisfaction that there is sufficient evidence that the jamabandi has been created in violation of any law or in contravention of any executive instructions.
8. On bare perusal of the provisions as contained in Section 9(1) and Rule 13 (3), it is apparent that the Additional Collector either suo motu or on an application in this behalf filed by any person is required to record his own satisfaction with regard to creation of jamabandi in violation of any law or in contravention of any executive instruction and only thereafter shall initiate proceeding and issue notice to the person in whose name jamabandi is standing but from the order dated 08.07.2019 (Annexure 2) and the notice (Annexure 3) issued thereupon, it is crystal clear that there is absence of satisfaction on the part of the Additional Collector and the Additional Collector appears to have acted perfunctorily and initiated the proceeding for cancellation of jamabandi without recording his own satisfaction merely on receipt of the petition of the respondent. Therefore, I find that the order dated 08.07.2019 (Annexure 2) and the notice (Annexure 3) issued thereupon are illegal and fit to be set aside. In this view of the fact, the order dated 08.07.2019 (Annexure 2) and the notice (Annexure 3) issued thereupon are set aside. The matter is remitted to the Additional Collector, Kishanganj to pass order afresh in accordance with law.
9. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.