Back
SHIVAJI PANDEY, PARTHA SARTHY
Amar Dev Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shivaji Pandey, J.
Heard the parties.
2. In the present case, the petitioner is raising his grievance with respect to three questions i.e. Question Nos. 58, 126 and 133 of Set -D of question booklet of 31st Bihar Judicial Services (Preliminary) Competitive Examination.
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has wrongly been declared unsuccessful in the aforesaid Preliminary Examination as his name could not find place in the list of successful candidates.
4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Commission has wrongly given 'B' is the correct answer of question no. 58 of Booklet-D, but in fact 'C is the correct answer. With regard to question no. 126 of the same booklet, the Commission has wrongly given 'C is the correct answer, but in fact 'D' is the correct answer. With regard to question no. 133 of the same booklet, the Commission has wrongly given 'C is the correct answer, but in fact 'B' is the correct answer.
5. After examination was conducted, the Commission has issued a notice dated 19.12.2020 in its website, asking the candidates that the model answer (provisional) would be available on the website if any candidate has to raise objection with regard to an
Judicial review in matters of academic evaluation is limited, and courts should defer to expert opinions unless there are specific provisions allowing for re-evaluation.
The petitioner cannot challenge the selection process at a later stage.
The court upheld the final Answer Key and the Expert Panel's recommendations, emphasizing the integrity of the examination process and the lack of procedural irregularities in evaluating objections.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
