Nagendra Paswan vs State Of Bihar - 2021 Supreme(Pat) 1006

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1006

VIKASH JAIN
Nagendra Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Raju Giri, Advocate, Mr. Santosh Kumar Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent Mr. Balram Kapri, AC, Mr.Satyendra Kumar Jha, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The following reliefs as formulated by the petitioner have been claimed in the writ petition --

i) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to give effect the office order No. 5/ Stha (Vividh) Kshe-08-47/2014 129 dated 09.08.2016 (Annexure-4) whereby the petitioner had been granted with effect from 07.04.2010 the benefit of third Modified Assured Career Progression (M.A.C.P) of Grade Pay of Rs. 4,800/-in Pay Band-2 of Head Assistant on completion of 30 years of service with entire consequential benefits;

ii) To issue of writ in the nature of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside Letter No. 129 dated 10.02.2017 issued by the Superintending Engineer, National Highway Circle, Muzaffarpur (as contained in Annexure-7);

iii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent to pay arrears of pay and allowance with effect from 07.04.2010 along with interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum until the date of payment on th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document