ORDER

Both the applications have been heard together and are being disposed off by this common order.

2. The petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 18665 of 2015 are the elder brother’s wife, elder brother, married sister-in-law and mother-in-law, who is reported to be dead, respectively.

3. Dr. Amrendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners in Cr. Misc No. 18665 of 2015 seeks permission of this Court to delete the name of petitioner No. 4/Sneh Prabha Devi (mother-in-law) from the array of the parties.

Permission is accorded.

The name of petitioner No. 4 is deleted.

4. In Cr. Misc. No. No. 19531 of 2015, the petitioners are the elder brother’s wife and elder brother, respectively, who are being represented by Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Advocate.

5. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that shortly after the marriage of opposite party No. 2 with one Vinay Shankar, the demand of dowry in the shape of car and cash, which was initiated at the time of settlement of marriage, resurfaced. It has been alleged that all the members of the family including the petitioners in both the applications performed their part of incitement to the other family members to trouble and harass the opposite party N