SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 305

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Ram Datta Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Raja Ram Mishra.
For the Respondent: None.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.:–Heard Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, the learned Advocate for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State.

2. The appellant had been subjected to a departmental proceeding with respect to the charges relating to making excess payment by violating the rules in that regard; payment of security money without completion of the work etc.

3. Though the appellant had participated in the inquiry, but the inquiry report, dated 30.05.1995, was never served upon him. Nonetheless, the inquiry report was acted upon and he was served with an order of punishment dated 13.02.1998. The punishment included censor and withholding of three annual increments with cumulative effect as well as recovery of Rs. 1.06 lacs with the additional stipulation that the appellant shall not be entitled to anything beyond the subsistence allowance during the period of suspension.

4. The aforesaid order could not be sustained in C.W.J.C. No. 7997 of 1998, whereby a Bench of this Court had remitted the case to the concerned authority for passing an appropriate order in accordance with law after giving opportunity to the appellant to file his response to the inquiry report.

5. It appears from the records t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top