SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 354

RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, A. M. BADAR
Mithun Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : M/s Sanjeev Kumar, Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi.
For the State : None.

JUDGMENT

A. M. BADAR, J.:–

By this appeal, appellant/accused Mithun Paswan is challenging the Judgment and Order dated 15.01.2014 and 18.01.2014 respectively passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-II, Khagaria, in Sessions Trial No.394 of 2010, thereby convicting him of the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code. For the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, he is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life along with imposition of fine of Rs.5000/- and for the offence punishable under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code, he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years apart from imposition of fine of Rs.5000/-. The learned trial court awarded default sentence of imprisonment for six months. Substantive sentences are directed to run concurrently. For the sake of convenience, the appellant shall be referred to in his original capacity as “an accused”.

2. Facts in brief leading to the prosecution of the accused can be summarized thus:—

(a) It is case of the prosecution that by kidnapping victim Laxman Paswan on 22.03.2010, the accused along with juvenile in conflict with law Tuntun Paswan had committed h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top