SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 434

P. B. BAJANTHRI, RAJIV ROY
Ramesh Chandra Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Madhusudan Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Kanak Verma.

RAJIV ROY, J.:–The petitioner has knocked the doors of Patna High Court for setting aside the order dated 23.10.2019 (Annexure-P1) passed in O.A. No. 050/00066/16 with M.A. No. 050/00036/16 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench Patna (henceforth the short ‘the Tribunal’) by which the O.A. preferred by him was dismissed.

2. The matrix of facts leading to the present writ petition is/are as follows :—

3. The post of ‘EBPDM’, Rupauli EBDC under Muzaffarpur Division had fallen vacant due to promotion of Sri Suresh Chandra Sinha. The vacancy of the said post was notified to Employment Exchange, Muzaffarpur giving the preference to the ST candidate vide Letter No. A-555/Rupalli dated 22/30.09.96 by the Sr. Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur. The Employment Exchange, Muzaffarpur sponsored six nominations along with their application and documents vide Letter No. Patrank/O.C./36/96-960 dated 30.10.1996 with breakup of one OBC, one SC and four ST candidates. On the basis of caste certificate of ST issued by the BDO, Saraiya, Muzaffarpur, one Shri Ramesh Chandra Sinha (the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top