SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 675

SUDHIR SINGH, SHAILENDRA SINGH
Bigan Dom – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra.
For the Respondent: Mr. Bipin Kumar.

Sudhir Singh, J.—The present criminal appeal has been preferred in the year 1995 i.e. 27 years ago against the judgment of conviction dated 30.08.1995 and order of sentence dated 31.08.1995 passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Trial No. 127/93/9/93 (arising out of Madanpur P.S. Case No. 104/92), whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted under Section 302/34 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life under Section 302/34 of Indian Penal Code and to undergo imprisonment for a period of three years under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code with direction that both the sentences shall run concurrently.

2. It is the case of the prosecution as narrated by the informant (P.W.4) in his fardbeyan that on previous night i.e. 27.07.92, he was sleeping in a room facing east side and affixed taati on the gate. His father was sleeping on the south facing side of the room and his brothers were sleeping on the west facing side of the room. In the said house, there was another room facing north in which his mother (P.W.6), step mother Kamla Devi (P.W.7) and his wife Shanti Devi (P.W.8) were sleeping together. At about 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top