PARTHA SARTHY
State of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Surya Narayan Poddar – Respondent
ORDER
I.A. no.4 of 2021
Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The instant application has been filed on behalf of the respondent for directing that the decretal amount which has been deposited by the judgment debtor in the name of the decree holder and the money is lying in the Katihar District Treasury be paid to the respondent-decree holder.
3. The relevant facts for the purpose of the instant application in brief are that by order dated 11.9.2002 passed in CWJC no.6811/2002 (Surya Narayan Poddar vs. State of Bihar), this Court gave liberty to the petitioner (respondent herein) to file an application under Section 5 of the Act before the Collector of the district who was directed to complete the process and make payment within three months from the date of submission of the application and report compliance to this Court by filing a supplementary counter-affidavit personally sworn by him. As directed, the applicant-respondent filed L.A. Case no.2 of 2006 for deciding just and appropriate compensation payable to him. The said petition was allowed and on calculation, it was found that the applicant-respondent was entitled to get Rs.22,80,09
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.