US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
ANIL L.PANSARE
P.J. Rathod, M.Sc. (Prabhubhai s/o Jadhavji Rathod) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
ANIL L. PANSARE, J.
Issue Rule returnable forthwith. Learned counsel waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.
2. The question that arises for consideration is, whether interest will stop accruing once the amount awarded to the Decree Holder is deposited by the Judgment Debtor in the Court other than the Executing Court?
3. According to the petitioner - Decree Holder, the liability of the Judgment Debtor to pay interest on the amount awarded would not stop on the date of its deposit in the Court but would instead continue till actual payment is made to him.
4. In support of his contention, Mr. C. B. Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner, has relied upon jud
Interest on decreed amounts will not cease upon deposit in a court other than the executing court; actual payment to the decree holder is required to stop interest accrual.
Restitution principles require balancing the detriment suffered by one party against the benefits gained by the other, particularly in awarding interest on deposits subject to withdrawal conditions.
The court ruled that amounts deposited under a decree should first be applied towards interest and then to the principal sum unless otherwise directed in the decree.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that interest ceases to run on the amount paid to the decree holder upon withdrawal, and the judgment debtor is not liable to pay interest on the a....
Late deposit of balance sale consideration was justified under the circumstances, observing procedural compliance and bona fide actions of the decree holder.
The absence of a specified time limit in a decree allows the decree-holder to deposit the required amount at any time, affirming the principle that interpretations favoring the decree-holder should b....
The absence of a time limit in a decree allows the decree-holder to execute it at any time, emphasizing judicial interpretation favoring the decree-holder's rights.
Important Points
1. Sections 59 and 60, Contract Act, would be applicable only in pre decretal stage and not thereafter.
2. In the absence of specific direction contained in the decree or agree....
Delhi Development Authority .Vs. Bhai Sardar Singh & Sons
-
Read summaryP.S.L. Ramnathan Chettiar & Ors Vs. O.R.M.P.R.M. Ramnathan Chettiar
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.