SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1148

ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Raj Kumar Goenka – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv., Ravindra Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Union of India : M/s Dr. K.N. Singh, Manoj Kr. Singh.
For the State : Mr. Shyam Kr. Singh.

ORDER

Heard Mr. Y.V. Giri, learned Sr. Advocate appearing for the petitioner assisted by Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, learned Advocate, learned counsel appearing for the Union of India Mr. Dr. K.N. Singh, Additional Solicitor General of India assisted by Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned Central Government Counsel.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Spl. Trial (PMLA) Case No. 7 of 2020 arising out of ECIR/PTZO/01/2017 dated 14.02.2017 for the offence under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) punishable under Section 4 of the said Act in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 298/2016 for offence under Sections 120(B), 420, 467 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case according to the informant, namely, Kunal Kumar is that the petitioner and his brother namely Ashok Kumar Goenka dishonestly and fraudulently got opened his bank accounts in Kotak Mahindra Bank and three accounts in ICICI Bank at Muzaffarpur by misusing his photographs and other documents without his knowledge and consent and again without his knowledge effected transactions worth Rs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top