SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 1288

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Tirthankar Ghosh, J.
Sri Shailesh Kumar Pandey – Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
CRM (SB) 206 of 2023
Decided On : 07-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ayan Bhattacherjee, Mr. Jakir Hossain, Mr. Molla Asraful Zamal, Mr. Arpit Choudhury, Mr. Ajeet Kumar Mahato.
For the Respondent: Mr. Arijit Chakrabarti, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Ms. Swati Singh.

Economic offences like money laundering under the PMLA warrant severe scrutiny for bail, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial while recognizing the gravity of the allegations and prolonged detention.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 45 - Bail application rejected - Petitioner in custody for over 14 months with no progress in the trial - Allegations of involvement in money laundering activities through dummy firms - Investigation ongoing and gravity of economic offences considered. (Paras 1, 34-35)

(B) Principle of Bail - Grant of bail in cases involving financial irregularities must be sensitive to the nature of allegations. Detention cannot be punitive and the right to a speedy trial is emphasized. (Paras 27, 34)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is implicated in money laundering involving approximately Rs. 77 crore through dummy accounts, having facilitated unlawful transactions and benefited from proceeds of crime. (Paras 2, 6, 34) Findings of the Court: The court concluded that the petitioner failed to satisfy the conditions for bail under Section 45 of the PMLA, as the investigation is in a critical phase and the nature of the alleged crime poses serious threats to the economy. (Paras 34-35)

Issues: The main issue was whether prolonged detention without trial warranted bail under PMLA despite the severe nature of the allegations involving substantial financial misconduct.

Ratio Decidendi: The court noted that the gravity of economic offences requires stringent scrutiny for bail, affirming no automatic release despite long detention without trial.

Result: Bail application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner requests bail on grounds of prolonged incarceration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. allegations involve misconduct including money laundering. (Para 3 , 4)
3. investigation indicates substantial evidence of financial fraud. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court weighs constitutional rights against statutory provisions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. final ruling denies bail based on ongoing investigations. (Para 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT :

Tirthankar Ghosh, J.

1. Petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with M.L. Case No. 01/2023 pending before the Learned Special Judge, CBI Court No.1 (being the learned Judge-in-charge of E.D. Court) as he is in custody for more than 14 months and there has been no progress in the case, further according to the petitioner investigation is still continuing and there is hardly any possibility of the trial commencing soon.

2. The genesis of the case was on the basis of a complaint by the Regional Manager, Regional Office III, Canara Bank, Kolkata and the subject related to one of the branches of the Bank at Narendrapur, B.D. Memorial Institute, West Bengal wherein M/s. T.M. Traders (A/C No. 120001761068) and M/s. K.K. Traders (A/C no. 120001761042) opened current account in their names on 31.08.2022. The aforesaid two firms submitted their KYC documents alongwith the account opening forms. Transactions were made on 12.09.2022 by M/s. T.M. Traders and on 03.09.2022 by M/s. K.K. Traders in their account. During the initial stage there were no huge transactions noticed by OTM Cell, Bangalore, (which is the controlling office of the bank, engaged in vigilance over abnormal transactions in newly opened accounts). On 17.09.2022 after observing huge debit transaction in the account of the aforesaid two firms Regional Office –III was informed for confirming regarding the genuineness of the account and for KYC compliance. As there were huge debit credit entries within a span of less than a month, the credibility of the transactions were suspected, thus to cross-check the authenticity of the residential permanent address appearing in Aadhar and PAN Card address the bank officials visited the addresses so furnished when it was detected that the parties were hailing from Jamshedppur, Jharkhand. No parties were carrying out business at the address which were furnished in the account opening form and also no such parties existed at the address furnished in Jamshedpur.

3. It was alleged that the entire credits were effected through UPI, NEFT, RTGS transaction and therefore transferred to multiple accounts by the customer to the parties via internet banking channel initiated by the customer either on the same day or next day. M/s. National Payment Corporation of India alerted the head office of Canara Bank on 30.09.2022 regarding unauthorized entity using account of Canara Bank for forex funding purposes prohibited by RBI. Name of the entity/website was TP Global FX account, A/C M/s. T.M. Traders, A/c no. 120001761068, IFSC-CNRB0019754. A criminal case was directed to be initiated as the parties have committed a criminal act against the bank by involving themselves in the process of some money laundering activities by a group of unscrupulous person/persons.

4. On the basis of the aforesaid complaint dated 01.10.2022 referred to the Deputy Commissioner, Cyber Crime Police the criminal case being Hare Street P.S. Case no. 290 dated 14.10.2022 was registered for investigation under Section 120B/420/467/468/471 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE .

5. Based upon Hare Street P.S. case no. 290/2022 dated 14.10.2022 under Section 120B/420/467/471 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , the Enforcement Directorate initiated their investigation/enquiry being ECIR/KLZO-II/21/2022 dated 21.10.2022.

6. The ECIR by and large reflected transactions made through internet banking channel used by the entity/website T.P. Global FX. Further the transfer of funds which were made from the two accounts through online mode to Punjab National Bank, Salt Lake Branch in the name of M/s.

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top