Back
TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Shailesh Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests bail on grounds of prolonged incarceration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations involve misconduct including money laundering. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. investigation indicates substantial evidence of financial fraud. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court weighs constitutional rights against statutory provisions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling denies bail based on ongoing investigations. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
Tirthankar Ghosh, J.
1. Petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with M.L. Case No. 01/2023 pending before the Learned Special Judge, CBI Court No.1 (being the learned Judge-in-charge of E.D. Court) as he is in custody for more than 14 months and there has been no progress in the case, further according to the petitioner investigation is still continuing and there is hardly any possibility of the trial commencing soon.
2. The genesis of the case was on the basis of a complaint by the Regional Manager, Regional Office III, Canara Bank, Kolkata and the subject related to one of the branches of the Bank at Narendrapur, B.D. Memorial Institute, West Bengal wherein M/s. T.M. Traders (A/C No. 120001761068) and M/s. K.K. Traders (A/C no. 120001761042) opened current account i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
