VIKASH JAIN
HDFC Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Kumar Verma – Respondent
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs. State of Maharashtra, 2014 (3) PLJR 509 (SC)—Distinguished.
Vikash Jain, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party through video conference.
I.A. No. 1 of 2020
2. I.A. No. 1 of 2020 has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the present civil revision application. It is submitted that as a matter of fact, the main reason for delay is that the petitioner was pursuing its remedy before this Court in Civil Misc. Jurisdiction No. 256 of 2019 filed on 30.01.2019 and disposed of on 25.02.2020.
3. Learned counsel for the opposite party appears and states that he has no serious objection if the delay is condoned and the matter is disposed of on merits.
4. Having regard to the reasons stated in the limitation petition, the same stands allowed and the delay in filing the present civil revision application is hereby condoned.
C.R. No. 23 of 2020
5. The present civil revision petition has been filed “for setting aside the order dated 14.12.2018, passed by the court of Subordinate Judge-XII, Patna, in Title Suit No. 212 of 2017, whereby the petition filed on behalf of the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 read with the Sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.