RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Krishna Mohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Mr. Y.Y.Giri, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, learned Advocate, Mr. Baidya Nath Thakur, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. These two petitioners are the father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the deceased. They are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Rajeev Nagar P.S. Case No. 160 of 2020 originally registered for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code but after investigation Police has submitted a chargesheet under Section 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
3. As per the First Information Report (Annexure ‘1’) the marriage between the son of these petitioners and the daughter of the informant was solemnized in the year 2015. The informant admits that after marriage the couple were living happily and the daughter of the informant had no complaint with her Sasural.
4. According to the informant, her son was murdered in January, 2020, thereafter her daughter was living in distress and pain. The informant was told about this by her Sasural people on many occasions whereupon the informant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.