SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 623

A. M. BADAR
Shariyat Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kishore Kunal.
For the State : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.

ORDER

The applicant/accused in Crime No. 01 of 2019 (Sessions Trial No. 1114 of 2019) registered with ATS Bihar Police Station for the offences punishable under sections 420, 467, 468 471, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 14 Indian Foreign Act, 1946 and 18, 38 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, by this application is seeking his release on bail during the pendency of the trial.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. He submits that the applicant was arrested way back on 27.3.2019 and on 7.5.2019, the investigator had visited his birth place which is Nandiya, West Bengal and confirmed that the applicant is an Indian citizen. He submits that this fact is reflected in paragraph 88 of the case diary (page-536). The learned counsel further argued that after filing of the charge-sheet, so far as the present applicant is concerned, charges for the offence punishable under sections 18 and 38 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 are only framed against the present applicant apart from that under section 120(B) of the IPC. It is further argued that there is no iota of evidence to connect the applicant to the crime in question.

3. As against this, the learne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top