SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 856

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P. B. BAJANTHRI, J.
CWJC No. 6581 of 2020
(29.3.2022)
Md. Faisal Ahmad ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav.
For the Resp.-State : M/s Subash Chandra Mishra, Shashi Bhushan Singh.

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 226 – Writ of quo warranto – Removal of respondent from the post of Director of the Rural Institute of Higher Studies – respondent was not appointed by the governing body – Usurping the power by the Education Department and stepping into shoes of the governing body as if Education Department is the appointing authority – Education Department is not the competent authority to appoint the respondent – Writ of Quo warranto is maintainable if there are procedural lapses or a person who has been appointed or occupying a public post on account of lack of qualification and other eligibility criteria – Order set aside reserving liberty to the competent authority to proceed in accordance with law in order to fill up the post. (Paras 3, 7, 12 and 13)

P. B. Bajanthri, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief/reliefs:—

“That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of Quo warranto directing the respondents to removed the respondent no. 8 from the post of Director of the Rural Institute of Higher Studies, Birauli, Samastipur forthwith as he has been holding the post illegally being appointed by authority having no jurisdiction apart from other illegalities in his appointment and to quash the notification as contained in memo No. 884 dated 19.05.2016 issued by the Joint Secretary to the Government, Department of Education Bihar under the order of the Hon’ble Governor by which respondent no. 8 has been appointed.”

3. Eighth respondent was a candidate for recruitment to the post of Director of the Rural Institute of Higher Studies, Birauli, Samastipur. Among others he was a candidate. The method of recruitment to the aforesaid post reads as under:—

“Appointment.—(a) Director of the Institute—

(i) Pay.—The pay and other allowances of the Director of the Institute shall be at par with other officers in Bihar Education Service Class-I as per decision of the State Government, but he/she shall not be a Government servant, since the Institute is an autonomous body.

(ii) Appointment to the post of Director.—For the regular appointment to the post of Director of the Rural Institute Birauli a selection committee shall be constituted by the Chairman of the Institute consisting of the following:—

(a) Principal Secretary, Education Department/Secretary/Special Secretary (Higher Education)—Chairman

(b) Director, Higher Education—Member

(c) Teacher not below the rank of Professor nominated by the Chairman of the Institution—Member

(iii) The Selection Committee shall recommend the names of three to five suitable persons alphabetically to the governing body for the appointment to the post of Director of the institute. The governing body may appoint any of the recommended persons to the post of Director.

(iv) The following shall be the minimum qualification/conditions for the appointment to the post of Director of the institute:—

(a) Post Graduate Degree with 55% marks in any of the subjects being taught in the institute.

(b) Ph.D. degree is essential.

(c) Teaching experience of a minimum of 10 (ten) years in any University/College/Rural Institute is essential.

(b) Teachers of the Institute.—(i) Pay Scale – The pay and other allowances of the teachers of the Institute shall be at par with other officers in Bihar Education Service Class – II as per decision of the State Government, but he/she shall not be a Government servant, since the Institute is an autonomous body.”

4. The process of selection for the aforesaid post was completed. For further action in respect of appointment governing body was authorized to issue order of appointment. In other words, appointing authority to the aforesaid post is governing body. Annexure 2 dated 09.01.2015 reads as under:

Underline Emphasized

Annexure- 2

fcgkj ljdkj

f'k{kk foHkkx

iVuk] fnukad 2015

vfèklwpuk

la[;k 15@o 3&97@98@jkT; ljdkj dh vfèklwpuk la[;k 527 fnukad 07-05-1980] 882 fnukad 05-10-1982] 1180 fnukad 22-06-2006 ,oa 1104 fnukad 14-07-2009 ds Øe esa xzkeh.k izfr"Bku fcjkSyh lfefr] leLrhiqj ds leqfpr dk;Z lapkyu gsrq xzkeh.k izfr"Bku ¼fcjkSyh½ lfefr ds fu;ekoyh] 1961 dh èkkjk 3 ds vuqlkj jkT; ljdkj us bl lfefr ds iquxZBu djus dk fu.kZ; fy;k gSA bl lfefr esa fuEukafdr lnL; gksaxs %&

insu

lnL;

1- ea=h] f'k{kk foHkkx

v/;{k

2- fodkl vk;qDr] fcgkj

lnL;

3- vk;qDr] njHkaxk izeaMy

lnL;

4- foÙk vk;qDr] fcgkj

lnL;

5- Ñf"k mRiknu vk;qDr] fcgkj

lnL;

6- izèkku lfpo] f'k{kk foHkkx] fcgkj

lnL;

7- vk;qDr m|ksx foHkkx] fcgkj

lnL;

8- funs'kd] xzkeh.k izfr"Bku] fcjkSyh

lnL; lfpo euksuhr lnL;

1- Jh v'k

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top