Shamima Khatoon vs State of Bihar - 2023 Supreme(Pat) 770

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 770

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Shamima Khatoon – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
M/s Manini Jaiswal (in 20636); Abhinav Srivastava (in 10022, 16446, 16457, 16482); Mritunjay Kumar Singh (in 3039, 20552); Jitendra Prasad Singh (in 9536, 9676, 9892); Purushottam Kumar Jha (in 10338, 961, 20610, 20646, 439, 693, 8020, 2364, 7808); Rama Kant Singh (in 4123, 5011, 13989, 14172, 15213, 17834, 4981); Sanjay Kumar Griyaghey (in 7498); Awnish Kumar (in 14254); Radha Mohan Singh (in 225); Kundan Kumar Sinha (in 490, 492, 501, 564, 622, 687, 12800); Ram Sagar Singh(in 354); Avanindra Kumar Jha (in 2351); Lala Sheshendra Narayan Rai (in 5912); Jitendra Acharya (in 6361).
M/s Binita Singh, SC-28, Kumaresh Singh, AC to SC-28(in 20636, 14172, 15213, 693, 8020, 2364, 7808); Madhaw Prasad Yadav, GP-23, Meera Singh, AC to GP-23(in 10022, 3039, 9676, 9892, 10338, 439, 501); Prabhakar Jha, GP-27, Umesh Narayan Dubey, AC to GP-27 (in 9536); S.S. Tiwary, AC to AAG-13(in 961); Madanjeet Kumar, GP-20 (4123, 16446, 16457, 20552, 490, 354); Umesh Narayan Dubey, AC to GP-27 (in 5011, 7498, 492); Shilpa Singh, GA-12 (in 13989, 16482); S.K. Ranjan, AC to GP-17 (in 14254); Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17(in 20646, 225, 564, 4981, 2351); Jitendra Kr. Roy 1, SC-13, (in 20610, 622, 12800, 5912, 6361); Subash Chandra Mishra, SC-16(in 17834, 687); Usha Kumari Singh, AC to SC-13(in 20610)
For the AG : M/s Raj Nandan Prasad, Vishesh Kumar Singh (in 8020),
For Accountant General : Mr. Ram Kinker Choubey (in 12800).

Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J. – In this batch of writ applications, three categories of cases have come up for consideration. In category-I, this Court would place those writ applications in which the writ petitioners are seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash their respective impugned orders by which the respondents have forfeited the pension as well as other retiral benefits of the petitioners. They are seeking a direction to the respondents to make payment of the pension and the other retirement benefits to the petitioners.

2. In category-II, the writ petitioners are those who have been inflicted with the punishment of dismissal from service. They are seeking setting aside of the impugned orders and the consequential benefits to the petitioners.

3. In category-III, the writ petitioners are those who have been served with a second show cause notice whereby they have been made available a copy of the inquiry report and have been asked to submit their response to disciplinary authority.

4. This Court would first deal with category I cases. The following writ applications w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Pat) 770

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASADShamima Khatoon – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (14)

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Shamima Khatoon – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent