SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 759

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Minakshi @ Sushre Minakshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Prabhakar Jha.

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.—In view of the judgment passed in the case of Suresh Ram vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (C.W.J.C. No. 5489 of 2020)* and connected petitions where this Court has held as under:—

“13. Having reached to the aforesaid conclusion, this Court directs that all the matters concerning teachers pending before this Court deserve to be first adjudicated on merits and on facts by the concerned relevant District Appellate authority. If still there is any grievance left, the concerned person would be entitled to take up the matter before the State Appellate Authority and this Court need not deal with such matters at the initial stage.

14. Having stated so, the learned counsel have informed that on account of Pandemic for the last two years, the State Government has not taken any steps for forming District Appellate Authority and the District Appellate Authorities are non-functional in several districts.

15. Accordingly, it is directed that the writ petition and similarly situated other writ petitions are required disposed of in terms as aforesaid with liberty to approach the District Appellate Authority. The petitioner would be free to obtain a certified copy of the present pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top