SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Pat) 2028

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Ranjit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Kumar Kaushik, Ms. Namrata Dubey.
For the Resp. State : Mr. Himanshu Kumar Akela.
For the Resp. Railway : M/s S.D.Sanjay, Satyeshwar Prasad.
For the Resp. RVNL : Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam.

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.—Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the L.A. Act, 2013’) states that in case of land acquisition proceedings, initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the L.A. Act, 1894’), where no award, under Section 11 of the L.A. Act, 1894, has been made, then all provisions of L.A. Act, 2013, relating to determination of compensation, shall apply.

2. Section 26 of the L.A. Act, 2013, lays down criteria for assessing and determining market value of land to be acquired. Proviso to sub-Section (1) of Section 26 of the L.A. Act, 2013, contemplates that the date for determination of market value shall be the date on which the notification has been issued under Section 11 of the L.A. Act, 2013.

3. For the purpose of determination of market value of land, what date should be treated to be the date of issuance of notification under Section 11 of the L.A. Act, 2013, in respect of acquisition proceeding started under the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top