VIKASH JAIN
Md. Mustak Alam Khan @ Md. Mustakram Kha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Vikash Jain, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order contained in memo no. 224 dated 30.04.2020 (Annexure-4) passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Pupri (Sitamarhi) by which licence of the petitioner’s Fair Price shop bearing no. 20 of 2020 has been cancelled and monthly allotment has been stopped; and further to restore the petitioner’s licence.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a short submission to assail the impugned order on the ground that a copy of the enquiry report was not made available to the petitioner and he was never confronted with the same with an opportunity of being heard or adducing evidence in that regard. A specific stand has been taken in para 3 of the supplementary affidavit that the impugned order of cancellation of licence has been passed without providing a copy of the enquiry report to the petiti
The judgment established that a summary inquiry for the cancellation of a fair price shop license does not require the supply of the inquiry report to the licensee or a detailed hearing, and that the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.