ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. Raj Kumar Singh Vikram, learned counsel for the appellant.

2. No one appears for the claimants-respondents 1st Set despite the fact that they have entered appearance and the name of the learned advocates of respondent nos. 1 and 2 are printed on the cause list.

3. The appellant in this case is an Insurance Company. Challenge in this appeal to the judgment and award dated 12.06.2015/ 12.06.2015 passed by the Motor Vehicles Accident Claim Tribunal cum Additional District Judge Ist, Munger, (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Tribunal”) in M.V. Claim case No. 15 of 2010 (Computer case No. 653 of 2013) whereby and whereunder the claim petition of the respondents 1st set has been allowed and the appellant has been directed to pay Rs. 7,89,500/-along with 9% interest from 21.02.2012 till the date of the payment through a cheque or bank draft within thirty (30) days.

Brief facts of the case

4. Claimants in this case happen to be the parents of the deceased, Ritu Raj Sharma. The case of the claimants is that on 31.05.2009 the said Ritu Raj Sharma was returning Hasd