Gaurav vs State of Bihar - 2019 Supreme(Pat) 2036

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Pat) 2036

ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
Gaurav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhinav Srivastava.
For the Respondent: Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the department of Science and Technology. On 14.05.2018, this Court has passed specific order noticing the injustice done to these petitioners, the Court asked the department to either provide job to the petitioners on the basis of the recommendation of the BPSC or to compassionate the petitioner by granting compensation. This Court granted further indulgence to the respondents on 26.08.2019 and on 06.09.2019 for ready reference the order dated 26.08.2019 and 06.09.2019 is quoted below.

“Put up this case on 06.09.2019 under the heading ‘For Orders’ to enable the department of Science and Technology to inform the Court how the department proposes to do justice with the petitioner in the background of the fact that the B.P.S.C. has recommended the case of the petitioner after clearance by the Department of Science and Technology as to eligibility of the petitioner. The department has to either provide job to the petitioner on the basis of the recommendation of the BPSC or compensate the petitioner by awarding compensation which according to this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document