SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, J.
CWJC No.8030 of 2020
(22.1.2021)
Nandkishore Paswan ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra.
For the Resp.-State : Mr. Lala S.N. Rai.

Headnote:

Public Distribution System – Cancellation of PDS licence – Prayer for disposal of appeal pending before District Magistrate – It has been pleaded that petitioner was a PDS license dealer and was discharging his duty to full satisfaction of his beneficiaries – Writ petition disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate that in case Appeal filed by petitioner against cancellation of his PDS License is pending before him, he shall dispose of the same by passing a reasoned order as early as possible. (Paras 3 and 5)

Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.—The petitioner has filed the instant application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:—

(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 31.12.2018 passed by Respondent no.3 by which the license no.5/2016 of the petitioner under public distribution system was cancelled.

(ii) And the petitioner further prays to restore the license no.5/2016 of the petitioner forthwith.

(iii) For direction upon the respondent no.2 to dispose of appeal no.47 of 2018-19 filed on 29.01.2019.

(iv) Any other order or orders as your lordships may deem fit and proper and in the fact and circumstances of the case.

2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is not pressing relief nos. (i), (ii) & (iv). He confines his prayer for issuance of direction upon the respondent no.2 to dispose of Appeal No.47 of 2018-19 filed by the petitioner on 29.01.2019.

3. It has been pleaded that the petitioner was a PDS license dealer and was discharging his duty to the full satisfaction of his beneficiaries. Vide order dated 31.12.2018, the respondent no.3 cancelled his PDS License No.5/2016 against which he preferred an appeal vide EC Appeal No.47 of 2019 on 29.01.2019 in the court of the learned District Magistrate, Patna.

4. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose the said prayer of the petitioner. He submits that if an appeal is pending before the learned District Magistrate, he would certainly dispose of the same in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order.

5. In view of the stand taken by the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Patna that in case Appeal No.47 of 2018-19 filed by the petitioner against cancellation of his PDS License No.5 of 2016 is pending before him, he shall dispose of the same by passing a reasoned order as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top