Amarjeet Yadav vs Union of India - 2021 Supreme(Pat) 1125

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1125

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Amarjeet Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Sanjay Singh, Vinod Kumar.
For the SSC : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Verma.
For the UOI : M/s (Dr.) K.N. Singh, Manoj Kumar Singh.

ORDER

It is not disputed by learned counsel representing the parties including the Union of India and the Staff Selection Commission (Respondents No. 2 and 3) that the same controversy which this application involved, was involved in CWJC No. 8370 of 2020* (Vikash Kumar vs. The Union of India & Ors.). The said writ application has been disposed of by an order of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court dated 13.01.2021, a copy of which has been presented at the time of hearing of this case. It appears from the aforesaid order that arising out of the same selection process, which is the subject-matter of present proceeding, a writ application was filed before Allahabad High Court giving rise to Writ-A No. 5049 of 2020 (Rupesh Kumar vs. Union of India) in which following order was passed :—

“The submission of learned counsel for the Union of India that Dr. Syed Naushad Ahmad, Deputy Superintendent, Government Hospital, Jamui who certified that two of the petitioners were not suffering from High BP/Hypertension was not competent to issue the same as he is not a cardiologist, has also no force. The qualifications of Dr. Syed Naushad Ahmad are not in dispute. He has done Masters in Surgery and b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document