Diwakar Paswan vs State Of U P - 2021 Supreme(All) 47

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(All) 47

YASHWANT VARMA
Diwakar Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State Of U P – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Devesh Mishra, Atipriya Gautam, Vijay Gautam (Senior Adv.)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Piyush Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel who appears for the State respondents.

2. This petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:-

"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari, calling the record of the case and quashing the medical examination result of the petitioner, dated 07/09/2020 & 09/09/2020 (which has not been served upon the petitioner and it was orally informed that the petitioner is medically unfit having "Hydrocele Testicle") declared by the Medical Board, for the post of Constable Civil Police and Constable PAC, Direct Recruitment -2018-II, pursuant to the Advertisement dated 16/11/2018 and in pursuance of the select list issued vide Notification dated 02/03/2020.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, commanding the Respondent Authorities, treating the petitioner as medically fit in the medically examination for the post of Constable Civil Police and Constable PAC, Direct Recruitment -2018-II, pursuant to the Advertisement dated 16/11/2018 and select & appoint him finally for the said post, in pursuance of the select list, issue