SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Pat) 1480

ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
Rohini Ranjana – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ajit Kumar Ojha, For the Petitioners; Mr. Avainish Nandan Sinha, For the Respondents.

Ashwani Kumar Singh, J. – The petitioner is informant of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No.34 of 2014 dated 23.1.2014 registered for the offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The said police case was registered against known accused.

2. From a bare reading of the written report it would appear that the informant came to know that her father died at about 1 a.m. on 23rd January, 2014 in Bankipur Club, Patna. When she reached at the place of occurrence at about 5.30 a.m., she found her father lying on the floor inside the club. Some bleeding was also noticed by her from his eyes, nostrils and ears. She suspected that her father had been killed by some unknown persons.

3. Being aggrieved by slow pace of investigation, the petitioner has approached this Court in writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The prayer of the petitioner in paragraph-1 of the application is as under: –

“1.That this Criminal Writ application is being filed on behalf of the petitioner above named for a direction to the respondent authorities to:

I. To investigate the matter in its totality and to come to a cogent conclusion in the present case.

II. In the alternat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top