SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 1626

SANJAY PRIYA
Deo Bharat Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu, For the Petitioner; Mrs. Sucheta Yadav, For the Opposite Party.

Sanjay Priya, J. – This restoration application has been filed for restoration of Cr. Misc. No.46203 of 2016 to its original file which stood dismissed on 04.02.2017 for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 28.01.2017. Aforesaid Cr. Misc. Application was filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in Sanjhauli P.S. Case No.11 of 2016 pending in the Court of Sub Judge 1st-cum- Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vikramganj, Rohtas.

2. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that if the aforesaid application is not restored, there will be irreparable loss to the petitioner. There was no deliberate latches on the part of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the State has, however, submitted that there is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure for restoration of a case. Moreover, this case has not been dismissed in default, rather, the same stood dismissed for non-compliance of the Court’s order.

4. Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure speaks about exercise of inherent power of the High Court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Inder Mohan Goswami vs. State of Uttaranchal reported in (2007) 12 Supreme Court Cases 1 has clearly hel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top