SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 1851

PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL
Dropadi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Pravin Kumar Gupta, For the Appellant; Mr. Anil Singh, For the Respondent.

Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J. – Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent on this miscellaneous appeal.

2. This miscellaneous appeal has been preferred against the order dated 15.03.2012 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Patna Bench in Claim Application No.OA 00169/2000, whereby the learned Tribunal dismissed the claim case of the claimant-appellant (Smt. Dropadi Devi).

3. The factual matrix of the case is that claimant-appellant filed Claim Application No.OA 00169/2000 for awarding compensation to the tune of Rs.4,25,000/- (Four Lakhs and Twenty Five Thousand) on account of death of her husband in the railway accident with the case in succinct that on 09.12.1999 her husband, Late Jai Prakash Sahani was travelling from Vina Ekma Railway Station to Saharsa Junction with a valid second class ticket by train no.333 Up Farbisganj-Saharsa Passenger. There was heavy rush in the compartment and resultantly her husband fell down from the compartment near north cabin of Saharsa Junction due to sudden jerk coupled with jostling of passengers with each other and died on the spot.

4. Opposite party-respondent filed its written statement and contested the ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top