SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Pat) 2242

SANJAY PRIYA
Rohul Saw Mills through Proprietor Md. Yakub – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Sharda Nand Mishra, Dhananjay Kumar Gupta.
For the Respondent: Mr. Kinkar Kumar.

Sanjay Priya, J. – Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned S. C.9 representing the State.

2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the letter memo no. 229 dated 19.3.2015 as contained in Annexure-10, issued under signature of the Divisional Forest Officer, Motihari, by which application of petitioner filed on 25.11.2014 for renewal of licence along with Bank Draft has been rejected.

3. The petitioner has challenged the order contained in Annexure-10, on the ground, that the same is non- speaking order. No any valid reason has been shown for not accepting the licence fee deposited by the petitioner for renewal of his licence for the year 2015. Learned counsel further submits that respondent -Principal Secretary, issued a circular bearing memo no. 2675 dated 30.8.2010 modifying the earlier circular no. 760 dated 13.11.2003 stating therein to include the name in the seniority list of all Saw Mills who have got the licence on or before 2002. If any, licence of the Saw Mills was cancelled or not renewed and they had not filed any appeal or, if any, filed and had got no benefit even then their name shall be included in the Saw Mills. Photo copy of the circulars dated 30.8

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top