Back
PURNENDU SINGH
Nida Amina Ahmad, daughter of Imtiaz Ahmad @ Farzana Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Amit Shrivastava, learned counsel along with Mr. Arif Daula Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Krishna Nandan Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr. Ram Tujabh Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:
The court held that the denial of a citizen's right to correct their date of birth in their passport constitutes a violation of fundamental rights, mandating adherence to circulars governing such cor....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Passport Authority cannot make a roving enquiry on its own and is not competent to decide the veracity of Date of Birth. It emphasized tha....
Exemption for minors in passport date of birth corrections is mandatory, overriding previous limitations or judgments.
Writ petitions may be withdrawn at request of petitioner without decision on merits.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
