SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 941

ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Praveen Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Ms. Archana Sinha.
For the State : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Though Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the informant, but today nobody appears on her behalf.

2. The present quashing application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 31.8.2021, passed by learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Patna City in Didarganj P.S. Case No.52 of 2021 (GR No.807/21) by which the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Patna City has taken cognizance under Sections 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against all the accused persons.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant has lodged the present FIR against the petitioners with allegations that the informant was married with the son of petitioner no.1, Praveen Kumar Singh on 20.04.2018 according to Hindu rituals. From the second day of marriage, the petitioners including her husband started reproaching the informant that she belongs to a beggar and dishonest family. It is further alleged in the FIR that the husband of the informant has taken Rs.6,00,000/- (rupees six lakhs) from the informant for reception at Begusarai and Ahmedabad. It is also alleged that inlaws of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top