Back
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Lalan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J. – Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition for following reliefs: –
(i) For quashing the order contained in memo No. 612 dated 07.03.2014 issued by resp. No.4 whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been dismissed from his service in contemplation of departmental proceeding.
(ii) For quashing the order contained in memo No. 2435 dated 21.01.2014 issued by resp. No.3 whereby and whereunder the statutory appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of dismissal has also not been considered and the appellate authority did not interfere in the order of dismissal passed by respondent No.4.
(iii) For quashing the order contained in memo No. 108 dated 8.1.2016 whereby and whereunder appeal memorial filed by the petitioner has been declared not valid as not maintainable.
(iv) For giving a direction to consider the appeal memorial application dated 25.02.2016 pending before respondent No.1 within a reasonable time.
(v) Any other relief/reliefs which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper.
3. The brief facts for adjudication of this writ petition is that while the petitioner was posted as O/C, F.C.I., Barauni he was su
The central legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement of appointing a Presenting Officer in departmental proceedings under Rule 17(5)(c) of the CCA Rules, 2005, and the adh....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
